Sturm v. Regan
Sturm v. Regan
588 So. 2d 595; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6975; 1991 WL 120791
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Sturm v. Regan
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the final judgment entered in favor of appellee on his counterclaim. We remand for a new trial on the issue of what actual damage appellee incurred as the result of appellant’s breach of the contract. See Lefemine v. Baron, 573 So.2d 326 (Fla. 1991).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.