Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Sheppard v. State

Sheppard v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 6, 1991 · Danahy, Lehan, Ryder
589 So. 2d 1035; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12813; 1991 WL 256205 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Sheppard v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for possession of methamphetamine and cannabis.

We do not agree with defendant’s contention that reversal is required by reason of a Richardson1 violation which occurred through the failure of the state to produce photographs which might tend to exculpate defendant.

The record does not establish that such photographs were in existence and available to the state. See Demps v. State, 395 So.2d 501 (Fla. 1981).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑