Wilson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Wilson v. State, 589 So. 2d 1036 (1991)
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12814; 1991 WL 256222
Danahy, Lehan, Ryder

Wilson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for possession and sale of cocaine. Contrary to defendant’s contention on appeal, it appears clear that there had been no entrapment under the objective test of Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1985).

We reiterate that in this court’s view that objective test was not abolished by section 777.201, Florida Statutes (1987). See Bowser v. State, 555 So.2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Contra Krajewski v. State, 587 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gonzalez v. State, 571 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Allen WILSON, Jr. v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published