Bing v. State
Bing v. State
590 So. 2d 561; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452; 1991 WL 273708
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bing v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Richard B. Bing, challenges his sentence, which was based on the use of a “multiplier” for legal constraint for multiple counts. Based on the recent Florida Supreme Court opinion Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991), we must reverse and remand for a new sentence.
We disagree with the appellant s second contention that the jury verdict in this case lacked the requisite specificity to support the minimum mandatory prison term of eight years required by section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1989).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW SENTENCE.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.