Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Hines v. State

Hines v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 9, 1991 · Anstead, Gunther, Warner
591 So. 2d 270; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10276; 1991 WL 200144 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hines v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Although we agree with appellant that he was entitled to raise the alleged sentencing error by way of motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we find the reasons given by the sentencing court in retaining jurisdiction over appellant’s sentence to be sufficient. Cf. Moore v. State, 392 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.