Hines v. State
Hines v. State
591 So. 2d 270; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10276; 1991 WL 200144
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hines v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. Although we agree with appellant that he was entitled to raise the alleged sentencing error by way of motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we find the reasons given by the sentencing court in retaining jurisdiction over appellant’s sentence to be sufficient. Cf. Moore v. State, 392 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.