Arnett v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Arnett v. State, 591 So. 2d 1014 (1991)
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13240; 1991 WL 272776
Joanos, Shivers, Zehmer

Arnett v. State

Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order denying his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As grounds for relief, the motion alleged sentencing error in the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over twenty years of the first one-third of a life sentence. It is improper to retain jurisdiction over a portion of a life sentence. State v. Mobley, 481 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1986); Clark v. State, 489 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Frazier v. State, 488 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1986); Stettler v. State, 475 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we treat appellant’s motion as a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, and remand with *1015directions to strike the retention of jurisdiction over a portion of the life sentence.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
David Ronald ARNETT v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published