Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Castrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
- Chacon v. Joell Designers Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
- Saintil v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Thomas v. Precision Response (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Buschor v. IDC Realty Services, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Hidalgo v. Keys Granite, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Ferguson v. Miami-Dade County (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Briceno v. Precision Delivery System, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Gonzalez v. Dar-Je, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- DeJesus v. Riconed, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
- Wallace v. ZAHN DENTAL COMPANY, INC. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Osmundo R. GONZALEZ, Appellant,
v.
MASTER FLOWERS, INC., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Osmundo R. Gonzalez, in pro per.
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellees.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission denying appellant unemployment compensation benefits. In a hearing to determine eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits, the appeals referee acts as the finder of *181 fact. Smith v. Krugman-Kadi, 547 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), review denied, sub nom. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n v. Smith, 558 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1990). "The decision of an appeals referee must be affirmed if it is supported by competent substantial evidence." Kan v. P.G. Cook Assocs., 566 So.2d 932, 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The record discloses sufficient evidence supporting the referee's findings; accordingly, the order must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.