Lerner v. Brin
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Park Adult Residential Facility, Inc. v. Dan Designs, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
- Home Pipeline Holdings, LLC, Etc. v. Chryl Nicolas (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- BEZL LIMITED, LLC v. RAYMOND OFFICE PLAZA, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- Cooper v. Brickell Bayview Real Estate, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Hilda LERNER, Appellant,
v.
Jacob BRIN, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Whitman, Wolfe & Gross, and Irving J. Whitman, Miami, for appellant.
Michael A. Bienstock, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, a beneficiary under her mother's will, appeals a final judgment in favor *520 of appellee determining that appellant exerted undue influence on her mother. We affirm.
Appellant contends that the trial court's findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Appellee asserts that the findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence.
Although one may have rachmones[1] for appellant, the trial court's findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence, and as such, will not be disturbed on appeal. See Gegen v. Learey, 503 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1971).
Affirmed.
NOTES
[1] Yiddish. Rachmones: Pity, mercy, compassion. F. Kogos, Dictionary of Yiddish Slang and Idioms (Castlebooks 1967).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.