Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Aikens v. State

Aikens v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 8, 1992 · Barkdull, Ferguson and Goderich
609 So. 2d 764; 1992 WL 360860 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Aikens v. State

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

609 So.2d 764 (1992)

Terrance AIKENS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-2809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 8, 1992.

Rubin, Rubin & Rubin and Eric J. Miller and Robert Borrello, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Randall Sutton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On direct and circumstantial evidence identifying the defendant as the perpetrator *765 of the charged offenses, the court properly denied motions for judgment of acquittal and submitted the case to the jury. Yuanis v. State, 347 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

The reason given by the State in peremptorily challenging a black venireperson — that a close relative had been charged with a similar offense — was sufficiently race neutral to justify removal. Bowden v. State, 588 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1596, 118 L.Ed.2d 311 (1992).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.