Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Perez v. State

Perez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 8, 1992 · Glickstein, Polen, Warner
590 So. 2d 1137; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 137; 1992 WL 1340 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Perez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We initially dismissed this appeal on the belief that it had been filed untimely. On appellant’s pro se motion, we agreed that the appeal was in fact timely, and reinstated it by order dated December 5, 1991.

Having considered appellant’s brief as well as defense counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we grant the motion to withdraw, and affirm the sentence appealed.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑