Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Anaya v. Anaya

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 7, 1992 · Cope, Gersten, Hubbart

591 So. 2d 1125; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 146; 1992 WL 1157 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Perez v. Perez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
City of Homestead v. Suarez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Rafael Anaya (husband), appeals from a final judgment awarding child support. We affirm.

Husband contends that the trial court erred because it did not strictly apply the statutory guideline method of determining child support. In Todesco v. Todesco, 583 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) the court stated:

Additionally, child support guidelines, while helpful, are not to be automatically applied; the court should consider both the needs of the child and the overall financial circumstances of the parties. Hillman v. Hillman, 567 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Huff v. Huff, 556 So.2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

In this case, because the trial judge considered the needs of the child and the financial circumstances of the parties, we affirm the award of child support.

Further, the wife filed for temporary child support and was entitled to the retroactive award of child support. See Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 554 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.