Dixon v. State
Dixon v. State
591 So. 2d 1151; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 677; 1992 WL 10910
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dixon v. State
Opinion of the Court
The challenged judgments of conviction are affirmed. Because the court failed to make the necessary findings when sentencing the appellant as a habitual felony offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, the sentences are vacated and this case is remanded for resentencing. See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1985), and Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.