Perez v. Unger
Perez v. Unger
591 So. 2d 1154; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 435; 1991 WL 276899
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Perez v. Unger
Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION
In a previous appeal, the plaintiff represented to this court that he would “adhere to the requirements for the prosecution of his case.” See Perez v. Unger, 571 So.2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1990). In addition, the plaintiff was warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not meet the requirements.
Accordingly, we affirm. See Arango v. Alvarez, 585 So.2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.