Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Wet 'N Wild, Inc. v. Bridger

Wet 'N Wild, Inc. v. Bridger
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 14, 1992 · Dauksch, Peterson, Sharp
592 So. 2d 1281; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1148; 1992 WL 24488 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wet 'N Wild, Inc. v. Bridger

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

In my opinion appellee failed to prove any negligence on the part of appellant which was the proximate cause of the injuries to appellee. The trial court should have directed a verdict for appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑