Gray v. State
Gray v. State
593 So. 2d 322; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1314; 1992 WL 26464
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gray v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.
Concurring Opinion
(concurring).
I concur in denying the motion for relief from the judgment of conviction pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In light of substantial data compiled elsewhere which suggest that state attorneys are unconstitutionally selective in the use of the habitual offenders statute to enhance sentences, I would leave the sentence question for another time. It has not
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.