Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Gray v. State

Gray v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 18, 1992 · Ferguson, Gersten, Hubbart
593 So. 2d 322; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1314; 1992 WL 26464 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Gray v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.

Concurring Opinion

FERGUSON, Judge

(concurring).

I concur in denying the motion for relief from the judgment of conviction pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In light of substantial data compiled elsewhere which suggest that state attorneys are unconstitutionally selective in the use of the habitual offenders statute to enhance sentences, I would leave the sentence question for another time. It has not *323been decided by this court. See Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.