Roddy v. Roddy

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Roddy v. Roddy, 593 So. 2d 568 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 514; 1992 WL 12310
Anstead, Frank, Letts, Richard

Roddy v. Roddy

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, J., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

I believe that the appellant is at least entitled to a hearing on the issue of attorney’s fees and costs. It is undisputed that there is a tremendous financial disparity between the parties in favor of the appel-lee. What is lacking is a record demonstrating the nature and amount of fees and costs claimed and a legal and evidentiary basis for denying the claim. On the present record we are left to speculate as to the possible basis for the trial court’s denial.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ruby Gayle RODDY v. Charles T. RODDY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published