Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Roddy v. Roddy

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 29, 1992 · Anstead, Frank, Letts, Richard

593 So. 2d 568; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 514; 1992 WL 12310 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Youngblood v. Michaud (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, J., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

I believe that the appellant is at least entitled to a hearing on the issue of attorney’s fees and costs. It is undisputed that there is a tremendous financial disparity between the parties in favor of the appel-lee. What is lacking is a record demonstrating the nature and amount of fees and costs claimed and a legal and evidentiary basis for denying the claim. On the present record we are left to speculate as to the possible basis for the trial court’s denial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.