Fortune Insurance Co. v. Iriban

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Fortune Insurance Co. v. Iriban, 593 So. 2d 598 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1050; 1992 WL 21864
Baskin, Jorgenson, Levy

Fortune Insurance Co. v. Iriban

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees to plaintiffs first attorney because (1) plaintiff’s insurance benefits were not wrongfully withheld, Ledesma v. Bankers Ins. Co., 573 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Obando v. Fortune Ins. Co., 563 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); § 627.736(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989), and (2) counsel stipulated that he would “retain a charging lien for services rendered and costs incurred on behalf of plaintiff. Said interest shall be satisfied from any court award made in the event the plaintiff prevails in this action.”

Reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Maria Teresa IRIBAN
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published