Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Lacourse v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 19, 1992 · Danahy, James, Threadgill

593 So. 2d 619; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1511; 1992 WL 29054 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pearson v. Caudle (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

CASE, JAMES R., Associate Judge.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence upon his violation of probation.

We need not and do not address the defendant’s argument that he should not have been sentenced to probation after having been declared a habitual offender. The record on appeal does not indicate that the defendant objected to that probationary sentence when it was imposed nor did he timely appeal that sentence thereafter. His acceptance of probation constituted a waiver of the right to attack that probation at revocation. Thompson v. State, 591 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); see Wolfson v. State, 437 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.