Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.
Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.
595 So. 2d 258; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2653; 1992 WL 43288
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.
Opinion of the Court
We affirm on the main appeal and reverse on the cross-appeal. Appellee, seller, is entitled to attorney’s fees to the extent that it prevailed on its claim that it was entitled to retain appellant’s deposit as liquidated damages. See Blue Lakes Apartments, Ltd. v. George Gowing, Inc., 464 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.