Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
595 So. 2d 286; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3220; 1992 WL 48692
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the appellant’s sentence as a habitual offender. The trial court failed to make the findings mandated by the statute. Rolle v. State, 586 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); § 775.084(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989).
We do not address appellant’s contention that the statute violates the single subject rule of the Florida constitution as the offense in question predated the amendment of the statute. Additionally, we note that the issue was apparently not raised before the trial court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.