Thaw, Gopman & Associates, P.A. v. Jack J. Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Pierce v. Kroha (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- Osheroff v. Osheroff (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the order denying the motion to vacate default filed by defendants Thaw, Gopman & Assoc., P.A., and Ronald Thaw. Under the circumstances of this case, the submission of motions to modify a stay and to dismiss the complaint instead of an answer as provided in the trial court’s order does not merit entry of a default. Joseph v. Marese, 534 So.2d 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Techno Indus. Corp. v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 410 So.2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.