Sirmons v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Sirmons v. State, 595 So. 2d 582 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3320; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 816
Danahy, Parker, Patterson

Sirmons v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 528 So.2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1988). We recognize that our decision in Davis is in conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur. PARKER, J., concurs specially.

Concurring Opinion

PARKER, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur with the majority. But for this court’s opinion in Davis, I would reverse this case because the record fails to show that Sirmons waived the trial court’s required findings under Chapter 39, Florida Statutes. See Evans v. State, 594 So.2d 835 (Fla.2d DCA 1992) (concurring opinion).

Reference

Full Case Name
Cornelius C. SIRMONS v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published