M.W. v. State
M.W. v. State
596 So. 2d 534; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4715; 1992 WL 80556
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
M.W. v. State
Opinion of the Court
We agree with the defendant that the circumstantial evidence presented by the state on the grand theft count failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence and will not support the conviction. However, the record supports the defendant’s conviction for dealing in stolen property.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.