Macon v. State
Macon v. State
596 So. 2d 769; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3883; 1992 WL 63948
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Macon v. State
Opinion of the Court
Gary L. Macon appeals his sentence entered after he pled to a multi-count information. He contends that the court failed to follow the plea agreement by not ordering the minimum mandatory terms for two counts to run concurrent. However, since the judge did not order the sentences to run consecutive, section 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. (1991) requires that they run concurrent.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.