Briles v. State
Briles v. State
596 So. 2d 1285; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4874; 1992 WL 83889
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Briles v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines due to the trial court’s failure to state contemporaneous written reasons for departing from the guidelines. See Owens v. State, 598 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1992) and Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 1990).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.