McCabe v. Rego
McCabe v. Rego
596 So. 2d 1285; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4878; 1992 WL 83892
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McCabe v. Rego
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I would reverse and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing on the Rule 1.540 motion. The trial court failed to allow appellant to present any evidence in opposition to appel-lee’s motion, and thus violated appellant’s fundamental right of due process by denying an opportunity to be heard.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.