Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Marriage of Fortun v. Fortun

Marriage of Fortun v. Fortun
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 29, 1992 · Farmer, Letts, Warner
596 So. 2d 1286; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4744; 1992 WL 83898 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Marriage of Fortun v. Fortun

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315.

LETTS and FARMER, JJ., concur. WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

WARNER, Judge,

dissenting.

There are several points raised in appellant’s brief, including visitation restrictions, failure to award alimony, and failure to make any equitable distribution of assets *1287which raise meritorious points. Of course, an answer brief may convince us that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in these matters, but I cannot conclude that the brief itself is so non-meritorious as to justify the application of Rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.