Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Gawron v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 8, 1992 · Altenbernd, Hall, Patterson

597 So. 2d 340; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4365 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Reyes v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Brenowitz v. Central Nat. Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

We find merit only in Gawron’s argument that he was improperly ordered to pay $100 to the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund without being afforded adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. Siplin v. State, 584 So.2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, we strike the $100 without prejudice to the state to seek to reimpose this cost after giving Gawron proper notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Gawron’s judgments and sentences are affirmed, but the $100 cost is stricken.

PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.