Innes v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Innes v. State, 597 So. 2d 966 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5260; 1992 WL 93680
Altenbernd, Blue, Parker

Innes v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 528 So.2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1988). We recognize that our decision in Davis is in conflict with *967Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur. PARKER, J., concurs specially.

Concurring Opinion

PARKER, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur with the majority. But for this court’s opinion in Davis, I would reverse this case because the record fails to show that Innes waived the trial court’s required findings under Chapter 39, Florida Statutes. See Evans v. State, 594 So.2d 835 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Reference

Full Case Name
Joseph INNES v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published