Dean v. State
Dean v. State
597 So. 2d 976; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5420; 1992 WL 98829
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dean v. State
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
In my judgment, the interests of justice require that a jury hear the newly discovered evidence of a person who admits committing the crime of which the appellant stands convicted. I therefore believe the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for new trial. See Jackson v. State, 416 So.2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.