Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Geffrard v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 27, 1992 · Anstead, Glickstein, Polen

597 So. 2d 987; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6121; 1992 WL 109962 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal as the order sought to be reviewed is a nonfinal, nonap-pealable order.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

I would not dismiss the appeal, but would affirm the order on review. I disagree that we lack jurisdiction to review a juvenile dependency review order that provides for custody of the appellant’s child to remain with the state. See In Interest of M.A., 593 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). *988However, I find no prejudicial error has been demonstrated on appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.