Jackson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Jackson v. State, 598 So. 2d 303 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5951; 1992 WL 104644
Levy, Nesbitt, Schwartz

Jackson v. State

Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We reverse Jackson’s convictions because, over objection, an investigating police officer was permitted to recount that defendant had “an arrest record and was recently released from prison.” See McGuire v. State, 584 So.2d 89 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); McCall v. State, 463 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Houston v. State, 360 So.2d 468 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Perkins v. State, 349 So.2d 776 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). The other evidence of guilt consisted entirely of non-conclusive eyewitness identification so we cannot say that the error was harmless, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986), and a new trial is therefore required.

Reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Eugene JACKSON v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published