Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Reynolds v. State

Reynolds v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 20, 1992 · Miner, Shivers, Wolf
598 So. 2d 305; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048; 1992 WL 104633 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Reynolds v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction of appellant as to the possession of cocaine and, therefore, the trial judge erred in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal. We reverse the conviction and sentence as to this count and, thus, find it unnecessary to reach appellant’s other issues.

SHIVERS and MINER, JJ., concur. WOLF, J., dissents with written opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

WOLF, Judge,

dissenting.

I believe there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to support the finding that appellant had knowledge and control of the contraband and, therefore, I would affirm.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.