Reynolds v. State
Reynolds v. State
598 So. 2d 305; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048; 1992 WL 104633
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Reynolds v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction of appellant as to the possession of cocaine and, therefore, the trial judge erred in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal. We reverse the conviction and sentence as to this count and, thus, find it unnecessary to reach appellant’s other issues.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I believe there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to support the finding that appellant had knowledge and control of the contraband and, therefore, I would affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.