Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Senko v. Singletary

Senko v. Singletary
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 20, 1992 · Kahn, Shivers, Webster
599 So. 2d 137; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4628; 1992 WL 76740 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Senko v. Singletary

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order of the trial court which effectively held that appellant was not eligible for provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes, on a sentence which precedes a habitual offender sentence. We reverse.

As we recently held in Dugger v. Anderson, 593 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), appellant is entitled to provisional credits on a sentence which precedes his sentence as a habitual offender. See also Woullard v. Dugger, 596 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and this matter is remanded to the *138trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SHIVERS, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.