Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Fielding v. Cerrato

Fielding v. Cerrato
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 29, 1992 · Cowart, Dauksch, Griffin
599 So. 2d 274; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6341; 1992 WL 111394 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Fielding v. Cerrato

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge,-

concurring specially.

I agree that the final judgment based on the jury verdict in this case should be affirmed. I write only to express my disagreement with the lower court’s ruling that the amount of compensation paid to an expert witness to testify in a medical malpractice case, or any case for that matter, is “irrelevant”. See, e.g., Langston v. King, 410 So.2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑