Munoz v. State
Munoz v. State
599 So. 2d 283; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6639; 1992 WL 123503
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Munoz v. State
Opinion of the Court
The sole point on appeal from the appellant’s conviction for trafficking in cocaine concerns an alleged Richardson violation. The record shows that the state committed no violation of its discovery obligations; thus, no requirement of a Richardson inquiry ever arose. See Palmer v. State, 483 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1986); Denny v. State, 404 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.