Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Murciano v. Jayan Corp.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 9, 1992 · No. 92-73 · Baskin, Cope, Hubbart

599 So. 2d 284; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6231; 1992 WL 123431 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Saggese v. Dept. of Revenue (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs in a quiet title action from an adverse final summary judgment. It appears that the plaintiffs’ condominium was sold to the defendant herein for nonpayment of real property taxes. Based on the circumstances of this case, we are unpersuaded that the admitted statutory compliance of notice to the plaintiffs of the tax deed sale herein violated the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. §§ 197.502(4)(a), 197.-522(l)(a); Williams v. Jones, 326 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1975), appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 803, 97 S.Ct. 34, 50 L.Ed.2d 63 (1976); D.R.L., Inc. v. Murphy, 508 So.2d 413 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 518 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1987); Weiss v. Prudential Enters., Inc., 387 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Stubbs v. Cummings, 336 So.2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); cf. Mennonite Bd. of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 103 S.Ct. 2706, 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.