Murciano v. Jayan Corp.

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Murciano v. Jayan Corp., 599 So. 2d 284 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6231; 1992 WL 123431
Baskin, Cope, Hubbart

Murciano v. Jayan Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs in a quiet title action from an adverse final summary judgment. It appears that the plaintiffs’ condominium was sold to the defendant herein for nonpayment of real property taxes. Based on the circumstances of this case, we are unpersuaded that the admitted statutory compliance of notice to the plaintiffs of the tax deed sale herein violated the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. §§ 197.502(4)(a), 197.-522(l)(a); Williams v. Jones, 326 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1975), appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 803, 97 S.Ct. 34, 50 L.Ed.2d 63 (1976); D.R.L., Inc. v. Murphy, 508 So.2d 413 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 518 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1987); Weiss v. Prudential Enters., Inc., 387 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Stubbs v. Cummings, 336 So.2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); cf. Mennonite Bd. of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 103 S.Ct. 2706, 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983).

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sadia Aquinin MURCIANO and Esmeralda V. De Aquinin, his wife, Dominic Campione and Domenica Campione, his wife, and Maurice Vaturi and Hannah Vaturi, his wife v. JAYAN CORP., a Florida corporation
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published