Ingram v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Ingram v. State, 599 So. 2d 785 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7281; 1992 WL 138783
Polen, Stone, Warner

Ingram v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no error as to appellant’s point I and we affirm appellant’s sentence. As to appellant’s point II, we do not consider his constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because appellant would have been found to be an habitual felony offender under the pre-amended statute as well. Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jonathan INGRAM v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published