Ingram v. State
Ingram v. State
599 So. 2d 785; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7281; 1992 WL 138783
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ingram v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find no error as to appellant’s point I and we affirm appellant’s sentence. As to appellant’s point II, we do not consider his constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because appellant would have been found to be an habitual felony offender under the pre-amended statute as well. Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.