Orton v. State
Orton v. State
599 So. 2d 785; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7269; 1992 WL 138798
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Orton v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm in all respects except we remand to the trial court to correct the scrivener’s errors. The State admits a scrivener’s error was made and that XVII was written instead of XIII on the sentencing form. In addition, the State acknowledges that the sentence on Count XIV should be corrected to run concurrent with Count XIII and not Count XVIII.
AFFIRMED, BUT REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.