State v. Freeman
State v. Freeman
599 So. 2d 1053; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6875; 1992 WL 131815
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the information as being overly broad as to the time frame charged. See State v. Jones, 539 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Our affirmance is without prejudice to the state filing a new information with the time frame more narrowly drawn.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.