Schweim v. State
Schweim v. State
600 So. 2d 45; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7188; 1992 WL 134828
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Schweim v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s judgment and sentence, including the imposition of court costs, is affirmed. We approve that portion of Condition Six of the appellant’s probation that states “You will not use any illegal drugs.” However, we direct that the remaining portion of Condition Six be stricken. See Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.