Arndt v. State
Arndt v. State
600 So. 2d 1131; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 798; 1992 WL 15905
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Arndt (Fla. 1992)
- Gilman Yacht Sales v. First Nat. Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appellee concedes that the issue in this case is controlled by Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing. As in Barnes, we certify the following question as one of great public importance:
WHETHER SECTION 775.084(l)(a)l, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1988), WHICH DEFINES HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDERS AS THOSE WHO HAVE “PREVIOUSLY BEEN CONVICTED OF TWO OR MORE FELONIES,” REQUIRES THAT EACH OF THE FELONIES BE COMMITTED AFTER CONVICTION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PREVIOUS OFFENSE?
REVERSED and REMANDED for resen-tencing.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.