Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Heilman v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Heilman v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 3, 1992 · Dell, Glickstein, Letts
600 So. 2d 1200; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6467; 1992 WL 115788 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Heilman v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The initial pleading filed in this case, which seeks review of an order of contempt and commitment entered by the trial court because of delinquency in child support payments, was submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari. This court previously determined that the proper avenue for seeking relief was by appeal; that the petition would suffice as the initial brief, and that the appendix was also sufficient.

In compliance with this court’s order of April 22, 1992, appellee filed a response to an emergency motion for stay of execution that was imbedded in the initial pleading. Because that response discusses the merits of the appeal in addition to the motion for stay, the response will serve adequately as an answer brief.

Finding the appeal to be without merit, the court withdraws further instructions on briefing found in its order of April 22, 1992, and summarily affirms.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.