Oyola v. State
Oyola v. State
600 So. 2d 1273; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187; 1992 WL 135052
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Oyola v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that the trial court erred in imposing restitution without allowing the appellant to present evidence concerning his ability to pay. Pope v. State, 575 So.2d 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for another restitution hearing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.