Ross v. State
Ross v. State
601 So. 2d 640; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8222; 1992 WL 164177
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ross v. State
Opinion of the Court
In this Anders
We write only to acknowledge appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel upon which we do not rule. Such a claim is more properly raised in a motion for postconviction relief. McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1991). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise the claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel by way of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
AFFIRMED.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.