Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Davis v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 24, 1992 · No. 91-03116 · Blue, Lehan, Ryder

602 So. 2d 606; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7549; 1992 WL 143623 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Pollard (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Jones v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress cocaine found from a search of his person after his arrest for trespass. The search was valid as having been incident to a lawful arrest. See Moreland v. State, 552 So.2d 937, 939 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), review denied, 562 So.2d 346 (1990). An arrest need only be supported by probable cause, see, e.g., Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 208, 99 S.Ct. 2248, 2254, 60 L.Ed.2d 824, 833 (1979), not necessarily a prima facie case. See Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 419, 89 S.Ct. 584, 590, 21 L.Ed.2d 637, 645 (1969) (“[0]nly the probability, and not a prima facie showing, of criminal activity is the standard of probable cause....”) (quoted in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 235, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2330, 76 L.Ed.2d 527, 546 (1983)).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.