Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Mullins v. State

Mullins v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 7, 1992 · Lehan, Patterson, Ryder
602 So. 2d 695; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8978; 1992 WL 187248 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Mullins v. State

Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant raises two points oh appeal, and we affirm as to the first point. As to the second, we reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), pursuant to Croskey v. State, 601 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (en banc). Also, on remand, the trial court may impose conditions of probation which reasonably relate to the crimes committed or to the appellant’s rehabilitation. Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.