Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Carroll v. State

Carroll v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 14, 1992 · Griffin, Peterson, Sharp
602 So. 2d 702; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8665; 1992 WL 193016 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Carroll v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of this Anders appeal, we have identified two minor sentencing errors. First, the public defender’s fee and lien in the judgment are stricken and the matter remanded for the required notice and specific opportunity for the defendant to be heard before assessment. Pope v. State, 598 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Rice v. State, 576 So.2d 434 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Anderson v. State, 556 So.2d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Second, there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement of restitution to the victim, Margaret Little, and the written order ($9.39 vs. $99.39), which requires clarification or correction.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.