Apparel Affiliates, Inc. v. Coren
Apparel Affiliates, Inc. v. Coren
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Concurring Opinion
specially concurring.
I specially concur only to record the reason why I do not agree with Judge An-stead’s partial dissent. As I read the written agreement in this case, the commission was based on a “net agreed selling price (includ[ing] labor, cutting, duty and transportation).” Under the facts, I believe the words “transportation” and “freight” to be synonymous.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting in part.
The trial court awarded appellee damages for breach of contract. I dissent only to the extent that I believe the evidence fails to sustain the trial court’s inclusion of certain freight charges used as a predicate for computing appellee’s sales commission. I would remand with directions that the damages be reduced accordingly. In all other respects I concur in the affirmance.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.