Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Shoop v. Shoop

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 8, 1992 · Alderman, Anstead, Gunther, James

602 So. 2d 974; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7833; 1992 WL 153953 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, J. and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Senior Justice, concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissenting in part with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting in part.

I dissent only as to the issue of rehabilitative alimony. There is no evidentiary or legal basis for the court’s order that the former husband pay an additional three *975years of rehabilitative alimony, in addition to permanent periodic alimony.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.